Silverman Thompson is proud to announce the addition of Kurt E. Nachtman as a partner in its Downtown Baltimore office. Mr. Nachtman, a highly respected trial attorney with nearly two decades of legal experience, will bolster the firm’s capabilities in personal injury, civil litigation, and white-collar criminal defense. At Silverman Thompson, Mr. Nachtman will practice…
Continue reading ›Articles Posted in Business Litigation
Update: July 28, 2024 – On July 22, 2024, Judge Bennett of the United States District Court for the District of Maryland preliminarily approved a $434 million settlement between Under Armour and a class of investors he had previously certified. The case was set to go to trial on July 15, but the parties reached an agreement to…
Continue reading ›Silverman Thompson is pleased to announce that on February 13, 2024, Judge Highberger of the Los Angeles Superior Court Complex Civil Litigation Division granted a motion they filed on behalf of firm client NFM, Inc. to compel arbitration of its former employee’s wage and hour claims. The plaintiff, who was only employed for two months…
Continue reading ›On November 17, 2023, the Circuit Court for Howard County granted a motion to dismiss filed by Silverman Thompson lawyers in the matter of George Arthur Willson, II v. TDH Farms LLC, ending the case against the Firm’s client. The case involved a complicated land dispute related to a barn built by plaintiffs that significantly…
Continue reading ›On May 10, the Circuit Court for Prince George’s County granted a motion to dismiss a negligent hiring lawsuit against the firm’s client. The plaintiff alleged that the client, a licensed residential services agency, failed to properly vet a home healthcare aide who conspired with the plaintiff’s former spouse to injure the plaintiff. Michael Levin…
Continue reading ›On March 28, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland granted a summary judgment motion filed by Silverman Thompson lawyers in the matter of McGill, et al. v. Koros, LLC, et al., ending the case against the firm’s clients. The case involved race and religious discrimination claims brought under federal law by…
Continue reading ›